Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Massive screen of drug combinations may find treatment for resistant, BRAF-mutant melanoma

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-10-massive-screen-drug-combinations-treatment.html


October 26, 2015
search and more info
A team of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) investigators has discovered a new combination of drugs that may be effective against one of the deadliest cancers, malignant melanoma. The combination - pairing a drug targeted against mutations in the BRAF gene with a second drug that targets another important signaling pathway - was discovered through one of the largest screens of cancer drug combinations conducted to date. Findings from the study conducted at the MGH Cutaneous Biology Research Center and Center for Molecular Therapeutics have published in the open-access journal PLOS ONE.

 "We wanted to see whether very-large-scale screening across a diverse collection of cancer cell lines and a large number of drugs could yield new combinations for patients with cancer," says Adam Friedman, MD, PhD, of the CBRC and the MGH Cancer Center, who led the study. "By conducting such a screen, we found one specific combination of agents that are already being used clinically that potentially could be used for a specific group of patients - those with BRAF-mutant cancers."

Friedman notes that, even with the increasing number of drugs targeting specific molecular abnormalities that drive tumor growth, most patients are only treated with one such at a time. Most of those treated with targeted-therapy drugs will relapse within a year, often because their tumors have become resistant, and some tumors never respond to the targeted drugs. While combining anti-cancer drugs appears a promising strategy, the sheer volume of drugs currently in use or in development - more than 500, which could make up more than 100,000 two- - makes testing each potential combination in clinical trials challenging.

Previous efforts to screen potential drug combinations only analyzed use of a few drugs against a limited number of cell lines or lines in which genomic variations were poorly understood. This study utilized 36 well-characterized melanoma cell lines assembled by the MGH Center for Molecular Therapeutics to test all possible combinations of more than 100 oncology drugs, two-thirds of which are currently in clinical use. More than 5,775 potential drug combinations, as well as each single drug, were screened against each cell line, looking for effects on the number and viability of tumor cells. While several combinations showed synergistic effects - with some drugs sensitizing the cells against several other drugs - most combinations increased the response of only one or two cell lines, implying that the vulnerability of an individual patient's tumor to these combinations depends on its unique genetic signature.

Since around half the cases of are driven by mutation in the BRAF gene, the team focused on combinations that might address intrinsic resistance to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. They found that combining that drug with the cediranib, an investigational drug that targets a group of proteins known to be involved in blood vessel formation, had synergistic effects against cell lines that were resistant to treatment with vemurafenib alone but not those sensitive to single-agent therapy. They also tested this combination in animal models into which two resistant cell lines had been grafted, and found significant synergistic effects against both tumor models.
"We need to confirm this synergistic activity of vemurafenib and cediranib across a broader range of melanoma models, investigate why the particular combination is effective, and find biomarkers that predict which patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma should receive this combination," says Friedman, who is a research fellow in Dermatology at Harvard Medical School. "What is really exciting is that these drugs are already in the clinic; in fact a clinical trial for a similar combination is already underway at another research center. We may be able to quickly improve on the selection criteria for this trial and identify patients whose tumors might respond."

He adds, "This study was actually a pilot project for a much larger effort within the Center for Molecular Therapeutics to map responses against drug combinations across hundreds of cancer cell lines, not just melanoma, and look for novel combinations that will benefit subsets of patients regardless of the particular type of tumor they have. Since our collection of is completely genetically annotated - which means that mutations and expression changes in each line's genes have been documented - we should be able to identify in advance patients who will benefit from specific combinations. Beyond the specific combination we focused on, this study should help others understand the technical challenges of analyzing such a large combination dataset."

VB-111 May Be Effective in Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

http://www.endocrinologyadvisor.com/itc-2015/itc-ata-vb-111-differentiated-thyroid-cancer/article/449338/




Sina A. Jasim, MD, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, said in an email interview with Endocrinology Advisor that most patients respond well to surgery and radioactive iodine therapy (RAI), but other patients with differentiated thyroid cancer develop resistant disease, “which is progressive, symptomatic, and fatal.”

“VB-111 is a non-replicating, engineered AD-5 adenovirus that is selectively targeting tumor vasculature,” Dr Jasim said. “It utilizes a tissue- and condition-specific semi-artificial pre-pro-endothelin promoter to express a pro-apoptotic FAS-chimera transgene that is triggering apoptosis of angiogenic tumor vasculature in response to tumor necrosis factor stimulation.”

Dr Jasim, who presented the data at the 15th International Thyroid Congress and 85th Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association, and colleagues explained that VB-111 is a novel approach that could potentially address the need for additional effective therapies.

Their open-label, industry-sponsored, dose-escalating phase 2 study analyzed the safety and efficacy of patients with advanced RAI-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer, where the end point was progression-free survival at 6 months for 25% of patients.

The researchers divided 29 patients into 2 groups that received a single VB-111 infusion at a low dose (3 x 1012 viral particles) or a high dose (1 x 1013 viral particles) every 2 months until disease progression.

Regarding adverse effects, patients reported flu-like symptoms after VB-111 administration, which commonly resolved within less than 2 days.

Results revealed that 35% of patients in the high-dose group and 25% of patients in the low-dose group achieved progression-free survival at 6 months.
At 12 months, progression-free survival was 25% in the high-dose group vs 0% in the low-dose group, which may suggest dose-dependent disease stabilization. However, this finding did not reach statistical significance.

Current results indicate that median survival is 18 months in the low-dose group and 22 months in the high-dose group, although the data are not yet mature, according to Dr Jasim.
Dr Jasim and colleagues reported that 9 patients survived until final follow-up, with 8 patients (47%) in the high-dose group.

The research group is continuing to follow the surviving patients, who have all progressed past 18 months post-treatment.

This study is supported by VBL Therapeutics.

Reference
Jasim S. Poster 638: A Multi-cohort Phase II Trial Of VB-111 In
Advanced Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Presented at: 15th International Thyroid Congress and 85th Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association (ITC/ATA); Oct 18-23, 2015; Lake Buena Vista, Florida.

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Month off drinking slashes risk of disease: Abstaining found to heal the liver and lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3289187/Month-drinking-slashes-risk-disease-Abstaining-heal-liver-lower-blood-pressure-cholesterol-levels.html

  • Doctors have warned drinkers should abstain for a month to prevent illness
  • Research has shown it can heal the liver and lower blood pressure levels
  • Those who gave up for a month also at lower risk of cancer and type 2 diabetes
  • Researchers claim 'staggering' results can influence drinking guidelines

‘The results were staggering,’ said Professor Kevin Moore, who was involved in both experiments. ‘If you had a drug that did this it would be a multi-billion pound market.
‘There was a 40 per cent reduction in liver fat, they lost about three kilograms in weight and their cholesterol levels improved.’

In the second, larger study the London researchers looked at 102 relatively healthy men and women in their forties taking part in a ‘dry January’ campaign.
The women had been drinking an average of 29 units of alcohol a week, almost double the Government guidelines. The men were typically on 31 units, ten too many.
All had blood tests and liver scans and answered detailed questionnaires. Four weeks later the damage caused to their livers by years of heavy drinking had started to repair itself.
Their ‘liver stiffness’ - an indication of disease - had been reduced by 12.5 per cent. Their insulin resistance - a measurement of diabetes risk - had come down by 28 per cent.
Current recommendations state men should not drink more than four units of alcohol a day or 21 a week
Current recommendations state men should not drink more than four units of alcohol a day or 21 a week
They had also lost weight, their blood pressure had dropped, and many said their concentration and sleeping levels had improved. The researchers are due to publish further details, which are expected to show their risk of developing certain cancers was also reduced.
Gautam Mehta, a liver specialist who oversaw the study, said: ‘I am excited. There are some findings that will be pretty novel. It’s an important study which shows the benefit from a month’s abstinence. What we can’t say is how long those benefits are, how durable those benefits are.’
The initial results are already being examined by Department of Health officials, who are preparing new guidelines on safe drinking.
Current recommendations state women should have no more than three units a day or 14 units over a week while men should not exceed four units a day or 21 a week.
One unit is equivalent to less than half a glass of wine or half a pint of beer depending on their strength and size.
But health professionals say these limits should be reduced. They also want adults to be told to have at least two or three days off a week to allow their bodies to recover.
The Royal Free’s first experiment was on ten men and women undertaking a dry January last year.
Tom Smith of Alcohol Concern said: ‘This evidence confirms what a growing number of other studies have shown, that having even just one month off from alcohol has incredible health benefits.’
Andrew Langford of the British Liver Trust said: ‘It provides good evidence that simple behavioural change can make a real difference to the health of your liver.’

Massive screen of drug combinations may find treatment for resistant, BRAF-mutant melanoma

 This is interesting because it involved a mutation I have (BRAF, common in Thyroid Cancer as well as Melanoma) and is using the drug I am on in combination with another.

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-10-massive-screen-drug-combinations-treatment.html

October 26, 2015 
A team of Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) investigators has discovered a new combination of drugs that may be effective against one of the deadliest cancers, malignant melanoma. The combination - pairing a drug targeted against mutations in the BRAF gene with a second drug that targets another important signaling pathway - was discovered through one of the largest screens of cancer drug combinations conducted to date. Findings from the study conducted at the MGH Cutaneous Biology Research Center and Center for Molecular Therapeutics have been published in the open-access journal PLOS ONE.  
We wanted to see whether very-large-scale screening across a diverse collection of cancer cell lines and a large number of drugs could yield new combinations for patients with cancer," says Adam Friedman, MD, PhD, of the CBRC and the MGH Cancer Center, who led the study. "By conducting such a screen, we found one specific combination of agents that are already being used clinically that potentially could be used for a specific group of patients - those with BRAF-mutant cancers."
Friedman notes that, even with the increasing number of drugs targeting specific molecular abnormalities that drive tumor growth, most patients are only treated with one such at a time. Most of those treated with targeted-therapy drugs will relapse within a year, often because their tumors have become resistant, and some tumors never respond to the targeted drugs. While combining anti-cancer drugs appears a promising strategy, the sheer volume of drugs currently in use or in development - more than 500, which could make up more than 100,000 two- - makes testing each potential combination in clinical trials challenging.

Previous efforts to screen potential drug combinations only analyzed use of a few drugs against a limited number of cell lines or lines in which genomic variations were poorly understood. This study utilized 36 well-characterized melanoma cell lines assembled by the MGH Center for Molecular Therapeutics to test all possible combinations of more than 100 oncology drugs, two-thirds of which are currently in clinical use. More than 5,775 potential drug combinations, as well as each single drug, were screened against each cell line, looking for effects on the number and viability of tumor cells. While several combinations showed synergistic effects - with some drugs sensitizing the cells against several other drugs - most combinations increased the response of only one or two cell lines, implying that the vulnerability of an individual patient's tumor to these combinations depends on its unique genetic signature.

Since around half the cases of are driven by mutation in the BRAF gene, the team focused on combinations that might address intrinsic resistance to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. They found that combining that drug with the cediranib, an investigational drug that targets a group of proteins known to be involved in blood vessel formation, had synergistic effects against cell lines that were resistant to treatment with vemurafenib alone but not those sensitive to single-agent therapy. They also tested this combination in animal models into which two resistant cell lines had been grafted, and found significant synergistic effects against both tumor models.
"We need to confirm this synergistic activity of vemurafenib and cediranib across a broader range of melanoma models, investigate why the particular combination is effective, and find biomarkers that predict which patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma should receive this combination," says Friedman, who is a research fellow in Dermatology at Harvard Medical School. "What is really exciting is that these drugs are already in the clinic; in fact a clinical trial for a similar combination is already underway at another research center. We may be able to quickly improve on the selection criteria for this trial and identify patients whose tumors might respond."

He adds, "This study was actually a pilot project for a much larger effort within the Center for Molecular Therapeutics to map responses against drug combinations across hundreds of cancer cell lines, not just melanoma, and look for novel combinations that will benefit subsets of patients regardless of the particular type of tumor they have. Since our collection of is completely genetically annotated - which means that mutations and expression changes in each line's genes have been documented - we should be able to identify in advance patients who will benefit from specific combinations. Beyond the specific combination we focused on, this study should help others understand the technical challenges of analyzing such a large combination dataset."

Explore further: New screening approach identified potential drug combos for difficult-to-treat melanomas
More information: PLOS ONE, journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0140310

Journal reference: PLoS ONE
 
 

Monday, October 26, 2015

The latest study about antioxidants is terrifying. Scientists think they may boost cancer cells to spread faster.

Good Grief, is anything safe?!?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/10/14/antioxidants-may-give-a-boost-to-cancer-cells-making-them-spread-faster-study-suggests/




Since the term "antioxidants" made the leap from the realm of biochemistry labs and into the public consciousness in the  1990s, Americans have come to believe that more is better when it comes to consuming the substance that comes in things like acai berries, green tea and leafy veggies.
A provocative new study published Wednesday in the journal Nature raises important questions about that assumption.
Antioxidants — which include vitamins C and E and beta-carotene, and are contained in thousands of foods — are thought to protect cells from damage by acting as defenders against something called "free radicals" which the body produces as a part of metabolism or that can enter through the environment.
That's all great for normal cells. But what researchers at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center found is that antioxidants can work their magic on cancerous cells, too — turbo-charging the process by which they grow and spread.
Researcher Sean Morrison and his colleagues conducted experiments on mice that had been transplanted with skin cancer cells (melanoma) from human patients. They gave nothing to one group. To the other they gave doses of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) which is a common antioxidant that's used in nutritional and bodybuilding supplements and has been used as a treatment for patients with HIV/AIDS and in some children with certain genetic disorders.
The results were alarming: Those in the second group had markedly higher levels of cancer cells in their blood, grew more tumors and the tumors were larger and more widespread than in the first.
"What we're starting to learn is that there can be bad cells from cancer that appear to benefit more from antioxidants than normal cells," he said in an interview.

Morrison, director of the Children’s Medical Center Research Institute at UT Southwestern, explained that it has to do with something called oxidative stress.
Scientists have known for a while now that cancer metastasis — especially when it involves spreading a great distance to another part of the body — is a very inefficient process and that many cells die along the way. This is likely due to oxidative stress, which is an inability by the body to counteract the harmful effect of free radicals. When antioxidants supplements are given, the paper hypothesizes, they may give new life to those cancerous cells that are on the edge of dying.

Morrison said that previous studies have shown that the progression of metastasis of human melanoma cells in mice is predictive of their metastasis in humans, which raises concerns about the use of dietary antioxidants by patients with cancer.
Moreover, melanoma may not be the only type of cancer to be affected this way.
A similar study conducted at Vanderbilt University and published in PLoS One in 2012 involving mice with prostate cancer also showed that antioxidants appeared to increase the proliferation of cells in the pre-cancerous lesions. And another one in rodents with lung cancer published in Science Translational Medicine in 2014 found that normal doses of vitamin E and smaller doses of acetylcysteine, an antioxidant supplement, appeared to lead to a three-fold increase in the number of tumors and caused them to be more aggressive. As a result, the mice given antioxidants died twice as fast the ones in the control group. The reaction appeared be dose dependent with larger doses leading to a more severe reaction.
Morrison said that further study needs to be done to confirm the findings and that cancer patients should still consume antioxidants as part of a healthy diet.
But, he added, "personally, from the results we've seen, I would avoid supplementing my diet with large amounts of antioxidants if I had cancer."
Over the past 20 years, numerous studies were launched to ascertain the effect of antioxidants on other conditions ranging from heart disease to memory loss. Early results have mostly been mixed, but that hasn't stopped food companies from hyping their disease-fighting abilities.

PD-L1 Strongly Correlates with Papillary Thyroid Cancer Aggressiveness

http://www.targetedonc.com/conference/ata-2015/pd-l1-strongly-correlates-with-papillary-thyroid-cancer-aggressiveness

W. Todd Penberthy, PhD
Published Online: 2:05 PM, Fri October 23, 2015
- See more at: http://www.targetedonc.com/conference/ata-2015/pd-l1-strongly-correlates-with-papillary-thyroid-cancer-aggressiveness#sthash.G9T2k0uM.dpuf

Investigators at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Toronto, Canada, have been working on determining whether or not PD-L1 expression levels and tissue (sub)locali - See more at: http://www.targetedonc.com/conference/ata-2015/pd-l1-strongly-correlates-with-papillary-thyroid-cancer-aggressiveness#sthash.G9T2k0uM.dpuf

TERT/BRAF Mutations a Deadly Combo for Thyroid Cancer Patients

http://www.cancernetwork.com/ata-2015-thyroid-cancer/tert-braf-mutations-deadly-combo-thyroid-cancer-patients

The coexistence of mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and BRAF genes dramatically increases the risk of thyroid cancer aggressiveness, tumor recurrence and thyroid cancer-specific deaths, confirmed research teams from the United States and Korea at the 15th International Thyroid Congress (ITC) and 85th Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) in Lake Buena Vista, Florida.
BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations each alone have a modest effect, but the two coexisting, had a robustly synergistic effect on PTC [papillary thyroid cancer]-specific patient mortality,” reported Mingzhao Xing, MD, PhD, of the division of endocrinology and metabolism at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.
Dr. Xing, the lead author of the US study, presented preliminary data on the TERT/BRAF mutations’ deadly synergy at last year’s ITC/ATA meeting, and this year presented data with a larger cohort of patients and longer follow-up time.
“The two mutations together are associated with much worse outcomes,” Dr. Xing said. “Coexisting BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations define a unique genetic background that robustly underpins the worst PTC-specific mortality.”
The coexistence of TERT mutation and BRAF—or RAS—mutations increases tumor recurrence, mortality, and “several aggressive clinicopathologic features” among patients, agreed the lead author of the Korean study, Young Shin Song, MD, of the Seoul National University College of Medicine in South Korea. Dr. Song reported his team’s study of TERT promoter mutations in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer in Korea.
BRAF is a well-recognized proto-oncogene and TERT mutations are suspected to lengthen chromosomal telomeres to immortalize cell lines, in part by evading apoptosis. However, it is not yet clear exactly how these particular mutations interact so powerfully in thyroid cancer.
Of the TERT mutations, C228T is the most common in thyroid cancers, Dr. Xing reported. The US team therefore focused on C228T mutation’s associations with the natural history and outcomes of PTCs. They followed 1,059 patients (764 of whom were female) who were diagnosed with PTC between 1990 and 2015. Using Sanger sequencing of primary PTC tumor genomes, they identified BRAF V600E and TERT C228T mutation status for each patient’s tumors, and analyzed associations between mutation status and patient outcomes.
The US researchers reported that during their study period, only four patients whose PTC harbored neither mutation, died of their disease—a PTC-specific mortality of less than 1 death per 1,000 person-years. “Almost no patients died—very few,” remarked Dr. Xing. Among patients with TERT or BRAF mutations alone, there were four and seven deaths, respectively, yielding PTC-specific mortality rates of 6.6 and 3 deaths per 1,000 person-years. But for patients whose PTC tumors harbored both TERT and BRAF mutations, the US team identified 15 deaths, representing a PTC-specific mortality rate of 29.86 deaths per 1,000 person-years. The associated unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 37.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.50–114.09), Dr. Xing reported. That HR dropped to a still-dramatic 9.34 after statistically adjusting the analysis for patient age, sex, tumor size, tumor multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, vascular invasion, and cervical lymph node metastasis, he noted.
The Korean researchers studied 551 patients with DTC (432 of whom had PTC), who underwent thyroidectomy between 1993 and 2012, among whom the overall prevalence of TERT C228T and C250T mutations was 4.5%. “This mutation was found more frequently in patients with tumors harboring BRAF V600E or RAS mutations (4.8% or 11.3%, respectively), or in the high-risk patients defined by the ATA high-risk group or the TNM stage III–IV group (9.1% or 12.9%, respectively),” Dr. Song reported. “Even after adjusting for clinicopathologic cofactors, the presence of TERT promoter mutations significantly increased the risk of both recurrence and thyroid cancer-specific mortality among the ATA high-risk group.”
TERT promoter mutations strengthened the prognostic predictions of the conventional staging systems,” Dr. Song noted. “Genetic screening for TERT promoter mutations could aid predictions of mortality and recurrence in DTC patients, particularly high-risk patients.”
- See more at: http://www.cancernetwork.com/ata-2015-thyroid-cancer/tert-braf-mutations-deadly-combo-thyroid-cancer-patients#sthash.tMAHGqTk.dpuf


October 23, 2015
News | October 23, 2015 | ATA Thyroid Cancer 2015, Thyroid Cancer - See more at: http://www.cancernetwork.com/ata-2015-thyroid-cancer/tert-braf-mutations-deadly-combo-thyroid-cancer-patients#sthash.tMAHGqTk.dpuf
News | October 23, 2015 | ATA Thyroid Cancer 2015, Thyroid Cancer - See more at: http://www.cancernetwork.com/ata-2015-thyroid-cancer/tert-braf-mutations-deadly-combo-thyroid-cancer-patients#sthash.tMAHGqTk.dpuf

The coexistence of mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and BRAF genes dramatically increases the risk of thyroid cancer aggressiveness, tumor recurrence and thyroid cancer-specific deaths, confirmed research teams from the United States and Korea at the 15th International Thyroid Congress (ITC) and 85th Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) in Lake Buena Vista, Florida.
BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations each alone have a modest effect, but the two coexisting, had a robustly synergistic effect on PTC [papillary thyroid cancer]-specific patient mortality,” reported Mingzhao Xing, MD, PhD, of the division of endocrinology and metabolism at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.
Dr. Xing, the lead author of the US study, presented preliminary data on the TERT/BRAF mutations’ deadly synergy at last year’s ITC/ATA meeting, and this year presented data with a larger cohort of patients and longer follow-up time.
“The two mutations together are associated with much worse outcomes,” Dr. Xing said. “Coexisting BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations define a unique genetic background that robustly underpins the worst PTC-specific mortality.”
The coexistence of TERT mutation and BRAF—or RAS—mutations increases tumor recurrence, mortality, and “several aggressive clinicopathologic features” among patients, agreed the lead author of the Korean study, Young Shin Song, MD, of the Seoul National University College of Medicine in South Korea. Dr. Song reported his team’s study of TERT promoter mutations in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer in Korea.
BRAF is a well-recognized proto-oncogene and TERT mutations are suspected to lengthen chromosomal telomeres to immortalize cell lines, in part by evading apoptosis. However, it is not yet clear exactly how these particular mutations interact so powerfully in thyroid cancer.
Of the TERT mutations, C228T is the most common in thyroid cancers, Dr. Xing reported. The US team therefore focused on C228T mutation’s associations with the natural history and outcomes of PTCs. They followed 1,059 patients (764 of whom were female) who were diagnosed with PTC between 1990 and 2015. Using Sanger sequencing of primary PTC tumor genomes, they identified BRAF V600E and TERT C228T mutation status for each patient’s tumors, and analyzed associations between mutation status and patient outcomes.
The US researchers reported that during their study period, only four patients whose PTC harbored neither mutation, died of their disease—a PTC-specific mortality of less than 1 death per 1,000 person-years. “Almost no patients died—very few,” remarked Dr. Xing. Among patients with TERT or BRAF mutations alone, there were four and seven deaths, respectively, yielding PTC-specific mortality rates of 6.6 and 3 deaths per 1,000 person-years. But for patients whose PTC tumors harbored both TERT and BRAF mutations, the US team identified 15 deaths, representing a PTC-specific mortality rate of 29.86 deaths per 1,000 person-years. The associated unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 37.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.50–114.09), Dr. Xing reported. That HR dropped to a still-dramatic 9.34 after statistically adjusting the analysis for patient age, sex, tumor size, tumor multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, vascular invasion, and cervical lymph node metastasis, he noted.
The Korean researchers studied 551 patients with DTC (432 of whom had PTC), who underwent thyroidectomy between 1993 and 2012, among whom the overall prevalence of TERT C228T and C250T mutations was 4.5%. “This mutation was found more frequently in patients with tumors harboring BRAF V600E or RAS mutations (4.8% or 11.3%, respectively), or in the high-risk patients defined by the ATA high-risk group or the TNM stage III–IV group (9.1% or 12.9%, respectively),” Dr. Song reported. “Even after adjusting for clinicopathologic cofactors, the presence of TERT promoter mutations significantly increased the risk of both recurrence and thyroid cancer-specific mortality among the ATA high-risk group.”
TERT promoter mutations strengthened the prognostic predictions of the conventional staging systems,” Dr. Song noted. “Genetic screening for TERT promoter mutations could aid predictions of mortality and recurrence in DTC patients, particularly high-risk patients.”
- See more at: http://www.cancernetwork.com/ata-2015-thyroid-cancer/tert-braf-mutations-deadly-combo-thyroid-cancer-patients#sthash.tMAHGqTk.dpuf
By Bryant Furlow
By Bryant Furlow
October 23, 2015
News | October 23, 2015 | ATA Thyroid Cancer 2015, Thyroid Cancer - See more at: http://www.cancernetwork.com/ata-2015-thyroid-cancer/tert-braf-mutations-deadly-combo-thyroid-cancer-patients#sthash.tMAHGqTk.dpuf